Legislature(2011 - 2012)
2012-04-14 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2012-04-14 House Journal Page 2422 SB 210 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 210(FIN) "An Act relating to crimes against children; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT HCS(JUD) NT 4DP 2AM 2390 FN1: INDETERMINATE(ADM) 2391 FN2: INDETERMINATE(LAW) 2391 FN3: ZERO(DPS) 2391 FN4: INDETERMINATE(ADM) 2391 FN5: INDETERMINATE(CRT) 2391 FN6: ZERO(ADM) 2391 FN7: INDETERMINATE(COR) 2391 FIN RPT HCS(FIN) NT 10DP 2414 FN1: INDETERMINATE(ADM) 2415 FN2: INDETERMINATE(LAW) 2415 FN3: ZERO(DPS) 2415 FN4: INDETERMINATE(ADM) 2415 FN5: INDETERMINATE(CRT) 2415 FN6: ZERO(ADM) 2415 FN8: INDETERMINATE(COR) 2415 2012-04-14 House Journal Page 2423 The Rules Committee submitted the following updated fiscal note: 9. Indeterminate, Dept. of Administration Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 210(JUD) "An Act relating to crimes against children; relating to persons found guilty but mentally ill; relating to sentencing procedures for factors that may increase the presumptive range or affect mandatory parole eligibility; relating to the granting of probation; relating to procedures for finding aggravating factors at sentencing; relating to crimes of human trafficking; establishing a task force to evaluate services available to victims of human trafficking, sex trafficking, or promotion of prostitution and examine the prevalence of those crimes; relating to the recommendations and report of the task force; amending Rule 32.1, Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure; and providing for an effective date." (HCR 30 - title change resolution) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 210(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 210(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 210(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 210(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 VACANT: 1 2012-04-14 House Journal Page 2424 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Cissna, Costello, Dick, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kerttula, Lynn, Miller, Millett, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Absent: Gara, Munoz And so, HCS CSSB 210(JUD) passed the House. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Johnson later gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on HCS CSSB 210(JUD), and reconsideration was taken up then.